Ů

Business Administration & Accounting: AI as a teaching partner

May 28, 2026
Becky Holt

In Saint Michael’s College’s Business Administration and Accounting program, faculty members Nicole Morris and Karen Popovich model a practical, transparent approach to AI integration — one that treats the technology as a “thinking partner” rather than a replacement for human expertise.

The approach to AI in business education focuses on preparing students for ethical, real-world applications. Students learn to understand AI’s capabilities and limits, evaluate outputs critically and ethically, communicate professionally while preserving authentic voice, and apply AI in workplace contexts with transparency and integrity.

“This exploration of AI’s capacity helps us be better at our craft,” said Morris, Associate Professor & LaMarche Endowed Chair in Business Administration and Accounting. “We don’t have all the answers, and we don’t ever pretend to have all of the answers in our classrooms. And our obligation with AI is to embrace it as a potential partner, and that means a lot of different things as we show up in the classroom.”

Ů Professor Nicole Morris

Saint Michael’s College Professor Nicole Morris

Both professors emphasized the liberal arts foundation of critical analysis when working with AI.

Popovich noted that working with AI as a thinking partner allows for broader initial exploration.

“You can start to generate ideas that are much bigger,” she said. “We’re getting much better at communicating with the tool, making sure that we’re sending chat into the right direction.”

Popovich used AI to design an experiential learning activity — a Catholic Social Teaching scavenger hunt —for her Gospel of Work course, which explores the intersection of religion, culture, and commerce. It was a creative way, she said, for students to connect theory with practice.

Morris created customized case studies with AI that connect abstract concepts to Vermont’s business landscape. For example, when teaching cost behavior and fixed versus variable costs, she began with base information from the textbook, combined with AI prompts, and then edited a generic base into an example that would resonate with students.

“Because we’re situated in Vermont, I want students to get to know our Vermont business landscape,” she said. “I’ll put a disclosure that the numbers are fictitious — they’re for illustration only — but it gives us something that’s tangible to talk about in a classroom.”

The time savings allow Morris to focus on higher-level work with students.

“I’m able to do so much more with my class, and to make my classroom more experiential, more engaged, rooted in the content that I’m the driver of,” Morris said. “It’s almost like working with your own personalized instructional designer.”

She added that AI allows her to think more expansively, as it is not limited by her own lived experience and background.

Headshot of Ů Professor Karen Popovich

Business Administration and Accounting Professor Karen Popovich

Both professors establish clear boundaries for student use and teach critical evaluation of AI outputs. This reflects the College’s broader commitment that students use AI transparently and responsibly, recognize bias and misinformation, and apply human judgment before accepting AI output.

Popovich assigned an exercise in which students were asked to use AI to revise their resumes as a way to consider the technology’s limitations. What the students discovered is that AI had overstated some of their skills and experiences.

“They realized that they weren’t always going to get something that was completely accurate,” Popovich said. The students learned “that they have to be the ones to verify and validate … evaluate with critical thinking and ethical reasoning.”

Popovich provides explicit guidance on when and how AI can be used in her courses. For journaling exercises, she prohibits AI entirely.

“100% human-made, no AI allowed. And that includes editing,” Popovich said.

For case studies and other assignments, students may use AI tools like Grammarly for grammar checks but must cite what percentage of their paper was changed by AI versus their own work.

“But for larger-based assignments where I really need them to connect ideas and to integrate, and to demonstrate their critical thinking,” Popovich said. “I want them to go to the Writing Center and use one of our peer writing tutors to help them because learning how to edit is a critical thinking skill. Anyone can copy and paste what Grammarly says to do. But I want them to be able to think, so I think they truly appreciate the safeguards when it’s on every assignment.”

Morris emphasizes that AI cannot replace the uniquely human skill of articulating ideas and reasoning.

“Helping them understand why their ability to articulate ideas and thoughts is so important, because AI can’t do that. So, it’s not just about the calculation, it’s understanding why I might recommend this?” Morris said.

Morris encourages students to use AI for ideation and revision rather than simply doing work for them. She also frames the decision to integrate AI as consistent with Saint Michael’s values rather than contradictory to them.

“One of the things that we talk about at Saint Michael’s is leading with purpose,” Morris said. “And I think that to avoid AI would not be leading. It would be ignoring the reality of the world as we know it and ignoring the reality that the world will continue to evolve.”

Morris said she has come to appreciate that students at the College want to do the right thing – to act with ethics and integrity.

“When you tell students what the boundary conditions are … they will rise to the occasion,” she said.


Read the collection of stories on AI at Saint Michael’s College. This story was published as part of the Spring/Summer 2026 edition of The Saint Michael’s College Magazine. 

Elizabeth Murray

For all press inquiries contact Elizabeth Murray, Associate Director of Communications at Ů.